Category Archives: Republicans

OPINION: A Timeless Debate, “Prayer In School” Remains A Divisive Issue

*An opinion piece I published in another publication*

The debate over prayer in school has been one of high contention for decades now, and with the dispute still making headlines it only makes me wonder if any real progress or headway has been made. Or will ever be made.

It was recently announced that the Supreme Court will hear the case of a high school football coach who was fired over holding postgame prayers at the 50-yard line. A federal appeals court ruled that the school board could force said coach from holding these after game prayer circles. This may be an offshoot of the actual “prayer in school” debate, but it is a slippery slope and here is where we are. This is definitely a case to keep an eye on.

It’s important to note in this particular case the fact that the Supreme Court has never outlawed prayer in school, so long as it is done privately, willingly, and in a way that is not forced or disruptive. However, the debate was first heard by the Supreme Court in 1962 in a case called Engel v. Vitale. The ruling handed down determined that prayer in school was a direct violation of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. At the same time, many in favor argued that disallowing or banning prayer in school is a direct violation of religious freedoms also protected by the U.S. Constitution.

An issue I once considered pretty cut-and-dry as a matter of personal opinion is actually one dictated by politics more so than morals and religion. But of course, that’s the way it goes. The principle is lost behind an agenda of “right fighters”, all claiming to have the answer based off whatever they feel they need to say to keep their jobs. I’ve often wondered how serious an issue this really should be considered and feel that maybe it should have remained a little more cut-and-dry.

When I say “cut-and-dry” I merely mean to each their own. If you are against prayer in school, you probably want to have your cake and eat it too; as long as it’s not the white, Christian God then pray away, right? And if you are for prayer in school, you have to consider all religions instead of making it a Christian and non-Christian debate.

The California Board of Education and Department of Education (CDE) just recently settled a lawsuit with parents over a certain Ethnic Studies program that required students to recite certain prayers and chants to Aztec gods. According to the suit, the CDE infringed upon California Constitution’s establishment clauses and state law banning government aid in promoting or teaching any religion in any particular fashion. This is a side of the issue that makes sense to me. If the recitation of these prayers and chants were taught as part of the educational curriculum provided by the state then I would have to side with the parents in the suit: religion should not be imposed upon someone in school per se, especially if it is a requirement and for a grade.

See? A slippery slope, indeed.

My feelings surrounding the matter are slanted, for sure. Although that may sound like I want to have my cake and eat it, too, I assure you that’s not what I mean by “slanted”.

Although a very polarizing, “Conservative vs. Moderate” issue most of the time, each and every circumstance is different and must be analyzed based on its own merit. A football coach getting fired for praying after a game, as long as it not forced upon the players, is an extreme that is less of a slippery slope and more of a nosedive into sheer ignorance. That being said, I honestly feel prayer in school should be done at the individual’s discretion, if at all, and in a way that doesn’t isolate or make other students uncomfortable. School is supposed to serve a singular purpose, and that’s not to divide the aisles any more than they already are by personal religious beliefs. There are already enough divisive issues our children are going to have to face in the school environment. Should we really add another one?

I also feel if you’re going to hang up a picture of Jesus Christ in your school (I attended a school in which this was the case), then it’s only fair to hang one up of Buddha, Mohammed, etc. If we’re going to pray in school, let’s keep it fair.

Prayer in school should not be a forced part of any school’s curriculum. The world and current cultural norms are only becoming more diverse, so for prayer in school to even be part of any discussion all voices must be heard.

It is ironic to me, however, how a majority of the proponents for prayer in school are pretty close-minded in their beliefs and how those beliefs should be carried out. Is this an across-the-board fact? No. And I wouldn’t dare to speak on an issue in such a blanketed, black-and-white way. I will, however, remain steadfast in my belief that the motives for or against prayer in school are skewed and usually exist for the wrong reasons.

OPINION: A Year Later, Evangelical Subsect Still Using Christianity as Guise for Jan. 6 Insurrection

It’s been just over a year now since the January 6 Capitol attack and if a desirable endgame has been attained in your eyes, then please, by all means, shed some light for me.

To say the phrase “all politics aside…” isn’t applicable when it comes to the aforementioned insurrection would be a blatant and outright lie. Politics, which was in fact the root cause behind the riot, should’ve been on the back burner while common sense, reason and truth governed.

If that were the case, though, this wouldn’t be an issue and I wouldn’t be sitting here writing this right now, would I?

It needn’t matter what side of the line you toe to understand the blatant rip-off perpetuated on Americans last January. However, it may make it easier for some.

Our politicians flat out played us. No, not all of them, and not all of us, either. But enough so that a group of predominantly white evangelicals followed suit. And in the worst of ways.

Behind a backdrop of Christianity and all the religious symbols and icons you can imagine, the actual truth and cause of the riot was nothing short of apparent. It was an attempt at a political uprising fueled by an outrageous lie and acted upon by a certain offshoot of the far-right.

With the truth veiled under a cloak of feigned “fundamental Christianity”, many of those who participated were blind to the lie. Many simply hid behind the lie. And many are still hiding behind the lie, and by choice.

I have a sneaking suspicion, however, that radicalizing one’s religious beliefs for the sake of personal and/or political gain is just as blasphemous now as it ever was.

But hey, all in the name of politics, right?

The sea of Christian symbols on display that day was paralleled only by the massive presence of Donald Trump supporters with their signs and MAGA hats.

There can be no denying that the events of that day were spurred and led by a group of white evangelicals, a specific camp of right-wing conservatives who were fueled by the whiny rants of the former president.

Calling on his base to stage a revolt in the days leading up to the actual riot, the former president used every card he had to stage this political coup that not only failed but continues to fan a political fire of divisiveness more than a year later.

So, were Americans lied to on that day last January? Yes. Duped in the days before by former President Trump? Undoubtedly.

And not for the first time.

Basing things off a temper tantrum of childish nonsense, the former leader of the free world ushered in a moment of true ugliness for this country. One that was totally avoidable, though not soon forgettable.

But those who participated in the riot weren’t the real players of the game anyway, just pawns used by those who were really pulling the strings.

And, oh, how those strings were pulled.

That being said, those who acted as “true” pawns played the role splendidly and to great effect.

No matter where your motives lie, though, using one’s Christian faith as a front for such a personal agenda doesn’t seem very Christian at all.

And yes, it’s easy to throw blame on the far-right wingers responsible for the riot – if it wouldn’t appear to be inclusive of all conservatives who also identified as Christians. Using a blanket statement like that may have helped clear up some of the under-the-surface ignorance before it turned into shear arrogance for many, but not for me. And it shouldn’t for you, either.

But we can’t blame every politician. However, you can be sure to thank a certain faction of them for helping perpetrate such a scam.

You can’t blame all white evangelicals as a collective or Christianity as a belief system, either. The fault lies in the lap of what is luckily a super-niche group of, for the most part, radical-thinking white evangelicals. A group using faith-based Christian ideologies to bolster their own conspiratorial efforts and beliefs.

In my opinion, using the Cross to hang a bloody American flag on is an act worse than treason.

In the end, though, it shouldn’t matter which political party you affiliate with. It should only matter that truth be the guiding light in a matter that is almost too polarizing to be so politicized.

And who knew that could even be possible?